Evolution of Pattern: Karl Dangel

Karl Dangel was a German art student who immigrated to Sweden at age 20, to avoid disturbing things he saw happening in Germany with the rise of Nazism, and then studied weaving in Sweden after he arrived. After marrying, he established his own weaving studio with his wife, Ebba in Malmö, in 1946. Ebba herself was a weaver originally from Lund who worked at the Hemslöjd in Lund and later in Malmö. As a designer, Dangel found a particular vocabulary of forms and colors which he explored consistently throughout his career. I will look at his work in several posts, trying to look at several of the different ways he combined these elements, and the way patterns mutated into the next ones.

The Dangel studio (“atelje” in Swedish), which operated out of a shop located first at number 12, Löjtnantsgatan (“Lieutenants Street”) in Malmo, and later at number 14, was very much a business. Dangel’s daughter recalls that Karl and Ebba wove every day, sitting together at a large loom 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. Saturday was Karl’s day to design the rugs they would weave, and Sunday was their day for museums, culture and refreshment. From about 1948-78, Ebba taught weaving classes as well to supplement their income.

Karl Dangel’s designs can seem hard to date, because he found a vocabulary of forms and colors and explored those throughout his career, with many of the forms repeated and reused with variations to become new designs. It should also be noted that while his name was Karl Dangel, he signed his rugs CD— because the C was easier to weave than the K! Most of Dangel’s rugs seem to have been flat-weave “rölakan” rugs. A later post will try to suggest a chronology for these rugs, based both on the memories of his daughter, some written and photographic evidence, and the designs of the rugs themselves.

One series of rugs designed probably in the late 1950s, suggests the way Dangel’s forms evolved and his patterns became more subtle. A slight change in a pattern gave a design quite a different visual feel, as did the use of different colors. This post shows three such transformations of an initial idea over an undetermined time period—transformations which produced four very different rug designs. I should note that, since both sketches and rugs are undated, this analysis is based on my own sense of the chronology of these rugs.

The “first” undated sketch shows a very regular, gridded design, with notched squares and a center figure in each square, alternating two or three arms. The rug was to be small: 83 x 140 cm.

Karl Dangel, undated sketch of flat-weave rug, from collection of his daughter. The potential size of the rug, 83 x 140 cm, is noted at the bottom.

The next sketch develops the previous idea. It is also on graph paper but this one is colored in a 50’s color combination of pink and grayish green. The two colors of alternating squares correspond to two kinds of central figures, with either two or three-arms. The sketch also shows the rug framed with a black inner border, as well as a border of wiggly shapes which seem an abstraction of the greek-fret border which Dangel had used on earlier rugs.

Karl Dangel, undated and unsigned colored in pink and grey sketch of flat-weave rug with a format of 4 x 6 squares; no dimensions given. Collection of his daughter.
Karl Dangel, detail of Greek fret border on earlier rug. Note sage-green color, which Dangel used frequently.

The rug shown below was clearly based on the previous sketch, but here made in a larger size— the format has 6 x 9 squares instead of 4x 6. The black inner border indicated in the sketch was not used here, and the inner figures were also further differentiated by the use of slightly differing tones.

2b-Dagel Crafoord 528_16 copy
Karl Dangel, flatweave rug (size not recorded), sold at Crafoord Auction house in Lund, 5/28/16. Signed CD lower left.

The following sketch shows the same design in gold, also with a format of 4 x 6 squares, here indicated as 140 x 200 cm, which seems to have been a size the Dangels wove frequently. The squares are in alternating tones of gold, and a yellow toned background for the border and between rows also seems to be envisioned.

Karl Dangel, undated sketch for gold and yellow-toned flat-weave rug, format of 4 x 6 squares, with figured border, signed CD in lower left. Size given as 140 x 200 cm. Collection of his daughter

The next sketch shows the first transformation of the initial design. In a terrific modification of the previous design, on a rug of precisely the same dimensions, Dangel has both simplified and made the pattern more complex. He has eliminated the border, but taken the shape previously used in the border and made it the basis of the new design. He has integrated the two-armed central shape of the more static earlier design with the border shape, placed two of these “3” shaped border shapes back to back, and notched and interlocked all of them with additional colors- now five colors including dark gold, light gold, yellow, pale pink, and white. This is now a very lively yet well-balanced composition. In addition, he has begun to use the twist stitch (which appears as tiny vertical stripes) as a decorative element, above and below the back-to back “3” shapes.

Karl Dangel, undated sketch for flat-weave rug, 140 x 200 cm. The notation of 58 x 77 squares was Dangel’s working drawing calculation for the layout of the rug on the loom. Signed CD in lower left.

The following sketch for a runner or gallery rug, is the same pattern, but with shades of sage green, darker green, yellow, cream and white, with a contrasting use of red twist bands, not placed over the back to back “3” shapes, as per the prior sketch, but over the single cross arms which are residual from the notched vertical elements in the original design. This rug also shows back-to-back “C” shaped borders at either end of the rug.

Karl Dangel, undated sketch for flat-weave rug in green and gold tones with end borders, 100x 180 cm, signed CD in lower left.

A “gallery rug” or runner, of this same design shows what this rug looked like woven in overall tones of gold and yellow. This woven rug combines elements of the two previous sketches— that is, it has the gold coloring of the first sketch, but employs the “C” borders and the locations of the twist stitch rows shown in the green design.

Karl Dangel, gallery rug 110 x 345 cm, signed CD lower left; private collection.

Karl Dangel, gallery rug 110 x 345 cm, signed CD lower left; private collection. (Sorry about the background!)


Karl Dangel, detail gallery rug 110 x 345 cm, signed CD lower left; private collection.

The following sketch shows how much an entirely different palette and a change in scale affect the design. The format uses the same elements, with 5 colors and borders of “C” shapes, but this sketch is for a rug of 140 x 200 cm or slightly larger than the green rug shown in the sketch above. As a result the pattern is organized slightly differently, and it is a tribute to the clarity of that pattern that it can be organized differently and yet still maintain its coherent coloration and organization. Here the back-to-back “3”s stand in the center of each end, with notched colors to both sides and another “3” at the outer edge. In the smaller green rug, pairs of back-to-back “3”s alternate with notched colors; there are no single “3” elements at the edge.

Karl Dangel, undated sketch for pink and red toned rug 140 x 200 cm. Signed CD lower left; collection of his daughter.

The rug shown below uses this same pattern, but with several significant changes. In this rug, the border runs all the way around, with “C” shapes used on the sides, and a kind of interlocked reversed “C” shape used at the ends. This border is not dissimilar to that in the first rug shown, so perhaps this rug was made before those rugs shown above. But what is most significant here is that the familiar “3” shapes are all UNcolored– to me this feels like an evolution from those with the colored “3” shapes. The color occurs only in the notched interlocking shapes and in the vertical one and two armed elements, giving the rug a very different but equally interesting balance of vertical and horizontal elements.

11-CDangelAuktionsverk4.16 300x 198 copy
Karl Dangel, flatweave rug, 198 x 300 cm, signed CD lower left; Stockholms Auktionsverk sold 4/16.

Looking at all of these as “rugs”— that is, assuming there were rugs made from the sketches above—it is difficult to determine if they were not designed in the sequence I suggest. It’s possible that the ones with the softer colors, i.e. the gold, greens and this blue one which also contains elements of the sage green and the raspberry pink that Dangel liked, were all made about the same time, but that the bright pink one was made later, during the 60-70s when Dangel’s colors became brighter and sharper. (It is clear from rugs he made to the same pattern in the 60s and 70s, that this was the case with a number of his designs, that they were rewoven later with more vivid colors).

The next sketch however, seems to me to mark a second transition. Dangel’s color palette is similar, but he has taken the “C” shapes and moved them into the body of the rug, and the whole relationship between shapes and background seems somewhat less resolved. This also seems to be the first occurrence of diamond shapes in his designs.

Karl Dangel, unsigned and undated sketch for flat-weave rug, 145 x220.

The rug shown below is woven in the pattern shown above, but in more typical Dangel colors of raspberry pink, green and light yellow, as well as touches of blue and pale lavender. Like the blue rug shown above, it uses the stacked reversed “C” motifs as border elements as well as in the rug itself. The use of the twist stitch here is again consistent with prior examples.

Karl Dangel rug, estimated 9’ x 12’, signed CD in lower left; private collection.


Karl Dangel, “CD” signature.


Karl Dangel, detail of large pink, green, light yellow flat weave rug, approximately 9’ x 12’; private collection.

At the bottom of the paper on which the last sketch shown above was drawn, was another sketch for a second rug. Dangel was clearly working on both this and the last design simultaneously— in this case, pulling out the small diamonds from the first design to make them the primary element of the second design. This was what I think of as the third transformation of the initial design, a process which yielded four such different rugs. Here the “C” and “3” shapes of the previous designs have given way to large and small diamonds, simple horizontal bars, and serrated edge patterns— all of which will become features of later rugs.

Karl Dangel, undated sketch for flat weave rug using diamonds in pink and blue pattern, drawn on same sheet as previous sketch shown, rug to be 145 x 230. Collection of his daughter.

The following images are examples of this rug as woven— again in the familiar Dangel color palette.

18-CD 233x 140 Buk Malmo 7_27_17
Karl Dangel, flat-weave rug, 233 x140 (almost the exact size specified in the sketch above), signed CD in lower left corner. On sale at Bukowskis Malmö; auction upcoming on 7/27/17.
19- Screen Shot 2017-07-20 at 9.54.26 AM
Detail, Karl Dangel flat-weave rug, 233 x 140 cm (almost the exact size specified in the sketch above), signed CD in lower left corner. On sale at Bukowskis Malmö; auction upcoming on 7/27/17.

In another collection is a smaller example of this rug with slightly different colors (or perhaps just photographed in different light), and in which the vertical bars in the design have been eliminated. It is also interesting to see again how different the pattern becomes when made in differing sizes. It is clear that Dangel continued to tweak and alter designs from rug to rug, both in color, compositional details, and kinds of borders.

Karl Dangel. flat-weave rug, approximately 1 x 2 meters, signed CD in lower left. Private collection.

The team of Karl Dangel as designer, weaving with his wife Ebba, produced a remarkably coherent body of work from their own small workshop. Unlike designers for larger operations who had more time to develop and perfect their designs before committing them to the loom, the Dangels worked out modifications to their designs from rug to rug, and drew on a consistent palette of symbols and forms over time. While less known than other more published designers from this period, many of their pieces are wonderful examples of the Swedish modern flat-weave tradition. And it is fun to discover the work of another male designer, when the majority of the designers were clearly female.



Bukowskis Online Auctions
Collection Karl Dangel’s daughter.
Crafoord Auktioner, Lund
Stockholms Auktionsverket

Please reference as follows:

Whidden, Anne, “Evolution of Pattern: Karl Dangel ” theswedishrugblog (7/21/17); theswedishrugblog.wordpress.com; accessed (day/month/year)



3 thoughts

  1. Good post and so glad you included the note about his signature. I had always wondered why he signed with a C.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s